Earlier this week, I got into a
conversation with someone online. If you follow me on Facebook and/or
Twitter, you've probably seen my ranting about this conversation.
Please excuse the repeat of the information you already have.
I posted a completely innocent comment
online about how Reidar doesn't like people food and how I found that
odd since my last three cats have all had a fondness for various
types of human foods. I had someone jump down my throat, tell me I
was a cruel and irresponsible pet parent, how I must have killed my
three previous pets (one vanished, one was hit by a car, and one is
still alive living in Washington with a friend of Himself's mom), and
how I was trying to kill Reidar. I should be arrested for animal
cruelty and have Reidar taken away.
When I countered his arguments with the
fact that I didn't let them gorge themselves on it, that I only gave
it to them in small portions as a treat, he said that I should stick
to what is in the pet stores as treats. Another thing he brought up
was if I wanted to give Reidar a real treat, I'd give him wet food
and I again was being a cruel pet parent if I was depriving Reidar of
this. There was more but you get the general idea.
I'll admit it. I fed the troll when I
got into the debate with him. But it brought a problem to light that
I've seen all over the net. People are so much nastier than they
would be in person to people they might not even know. They are
judgmental, they don't want to engage in a reasonable discourse, and
they're more determined to tear people down than actually talk.
I seem to be among a select group of
people who doesn't like tearing people down online. I couch my
responses to things in a civil manner, I don't (for the most part)
swear, and I respect other people's opinions even when I think
they're wrong. If I don't think I can stay civil, I don't leave a
comment or respond to one left for me. If it's something I'm
genuinely curious about the reasoning behind, I'll ask questions. If
it becomes a bash fest I'll walk away.
There are times where I will post
things that can be seen as controversial in some crowds. I fully
believe that if you want to talk to me about it, go ahead. I'll talk
to you as long as you don't attack me personally for my beliefs.
After that, the conversation is over and if it's possible you're
blocked. If it's on Facebook and we're friends, we're not friends
anymore.
Why isn't this a common thing on the
internet? Why does it seem that there are so many more people online
willing to be assholes towards others? I really don't understand
this. I've heard it called human nature, but what do you think?
Wow, that seems like a bit of an overreaction to feeding cats human food. Does this guy not realize that wild cats don't hunt bags of cat food in the wild?
ReplyDeleteIt's called "GIFT", the Greater Internet F*ckwad Theory. A normal person plus total anonymity equals a total jerk off. People just don't have the same boundaries online as they do face to face. No idea why. But they all need to be blocked.
I like the acronym. And I agree with you. I ended up blocking him because he continued badmouthing me even after this situation. I just really hate dealing with people like this.
DeletePeople are more brave about being jerks when they don't have to look the other person in the eyes. They can forget they are talking to another human being that they might relate to in other ways.
ReplyDeleteYeah. I read another blog post earlier today about how sometimes people forget their online friends are people too and say/post things that are hurtful. Sometimes it's a miscommunication, but this wasn't one of those situations.
Delete